Winner of Grammy Lost By Milli Vanilli: No Onebut Blame It on the Rain," written by Diane Warren, remains eligible in the 1990 Grammy category for song of the year

Winner of Grammy Lost By Milli Vanilli: No One

 

 

The 1989 Grammy award for best new artist, which had been given to Milli Vanilli and which was rescinded last month when the pop duo admitted that it had not sung on its album or in concert, will go to no one.
"The Grammy is not like an athletic competition," Michael Greene, the president of the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, said yesterday in a telephone interview after the decision was announced.
"The voting is not intended to produce a rank result. Had Milli Vanilli been moved from the intial voting, the results for the other four acts would probably have been quite different."
The runners-up for the Grammy were the rapper Tone-Loc, the singer and songwriter Neneh Cherry and the groups Soul II Soul and the Indigo Girls.

The decision was made by the academy's board of trustees. The academy moved quickly in rescinding Milli Vanilli's award, which was given in February, after it was disclosed last month that the duo, Rob Pilatus and Fab Morvan, did not sing on its first and only album, "Girl You Know It's True" (Arista), which sold seven million copies in the United States. A Song Is Eligible, but . . .
The committee also reaffirmed that Milli Vanilli's single "Blame It on the Rain," written by Diane Warren, remains eligible in the 1990 Grammy category for song of the year. Should the song win, the award would go to Ms. Warren. All other entries from Milli Vanilli have been deemed ineligible.
  • Thanks for reading The Times.
Subscribe to The Times
Three Milli Vanilli entries were submitted among the 8,000 entries in the 1990 Grammy nominating process. Those entry ballots were compiled and distributed before the academy's decision to strip the duo of its award.
"We're not an investigatory group," Mr. Greene said. "But after the nominations come out this year, if I hear that there is reason to question the legitimacy of the label copy on any nomination, we will be much more aggressive in trying to get to the bottom of it."

Comments